Conclusion
Leading themes delineating the Orthorhombic structure are evident in all three cases. In the Zincum phosphoricum case it was her need to accommodate the river of requests of others. In the Marcasite case the identification of ‘sensibility’, his poignant sense of the nature of art, the felt sense of the client. In the Chiastolite case it was the emanating visceral feeling of her held guilt and grief. Again taking me to the realm of felt sense. These themes of accommodation of others and felt sense are fundamental themes that specifically belong to the structure.
It is important to note that these themes were easily perceivable in each case through the vehicle of listening and allowing the client to express themselves. Very little encouragement or questioning needed to take place to gain the full expression of the structural elements. This makes structural analysis a tool, which is easy to integrate in practice.
Structural analysis now fulfils an important role in differentiating compounds and salts of the elements in my clinic, for the simple reason that each salt requires a specific structure to form. This alone makes it a valuable tool.
Lastly, in all cases the understanding of the nature of structure increased my ability to relate to and understand my clients. This factor alone contributes to the safe conduit a client needs to express their symptoms and state. Developing such an ambiance is a quintessential pillar of homeopathic case taking.
Bibliography
Gienger, M. (1998). Crystal Power, Crystal Healing. Heron Quays, London: Octopus Publishing Group.
Scholten, J. (1996). Homeopathy and the elements. Utrecht: Stichting Alonissos.
Tumminello, P. (2017). Psyche and Structure, gems and minerals in homeopathy, Narayana Verlag.
Welte, U. (2016). Colors in homeopathy. Chart and text book. Narayana Verlag.